The Secret History of The World

The Secret History of The World and How To Get Out Alive

by
Laura Knight-Jadczyk

BOOK REVIEW

A friend of mine recently sent me a copy of a new book by Laura Knight-Jadczyk that is so detailed, well-researched and comprehensive in it's scope, a reviewer might have an easier time asking what subjects it doesn't cover. For anyone who is interested in the truth behind human history and the reasons why our world is facing such dire straits, need look no futher than this monumental work.

Published by Red Pill Press, The Secret History of the World covers a vast number of subjects including; history, archeology, religion, mythology, art, quantum physics, alchemy, green language, shamanism, ancient science, conspiracies, the holy grail, cathars, superluminal communication, atlantis, cyclical catastrophes, biochemistry, and end times prophecy to name a few. It even proposes a real solution to the Da Vinci Code mystery, that seems to have taken the popular world by storm.

What is most remarkable about this book is how it can connect such disparate and wide ranging subjects in a real and meaningful way. Written with insight and humour, the author takes the reader on quest through the course of Earth's history in search of the real Holy Grail and the ancient science of ascension. One subject this book covers in detail is that of
hyperdimensional realities, that deals with the subject of "higher densities" interacting with our own over the course of human history.

This book will appeal to anyone who is serious about getting at the truth of our reality, and how by working on oneself to perceive this reality "objectively", is our only hope of possibly realizing a different future.

So it is with a certain amount of gravity that I say this could be the most important book for our times.

For the serious seeker of knowledge and truth, this book is a must have.

Relic

Bed the elephant

The following is an article from Macleans Magazine that serves as an example of propaganda in it's purest form...

We need much closer integration with the United States -- before it's too late

Comment: Nothing like starting off an editorial using manipulative scare tactics to get the reader's attention.

For more than 70 years, Canadians have profited from a close and mutually beneficial economic and security relationship with the United States, to the point that we assume it will never end. To make such an assumption is a grave mistake. In present global circumstances, nothing can be taken for granted.

Canada has much to learn from the European experience. The now 25 members of the European Union have worked assiduously to create the kind of beneficial interdependence that serves as a model of statecraft. They have done this by writing rules and building institutions to underwrite their great project and provide their citizens with the confidence that it will continue. Co-operation, shared experience and acceptance of common rules have become the basis of both European sovereignty and unity.

Comment: To compare this burgeoning North American alliance to the EU is most misleading. Outside of lapdog Tony Blair and his minions in the British government, most members of the European Union are opposed to Bush's illegal wars in the Middle East. Major European countries like France, Germany and now Spain, who still remember the horrors of WWII, act as a reasonable and effective counterweight to ongoing American and Israeli aggression.

[...] Rightly or wrongly, the U.S. no longer regards its northern border benignly. In a nation grown anxious about when and where terrorists may strike next, the border now looms as a point of vulnerability rather than a source of strength, a perception increased by the Martin government's decision not to participate in the ballistic missile defence initiative. Such a perception cannot be allowed to continue. It undermines the very basis of Canada's security and prosperity: cross-border trade and investment drive our economy; U.S. innovation and entrepreneurship propel our own; the U.S. military provides a blanket of security; U.S. intelligence is critical to our own; U.S. popular culture dominates because Canadians choose it; and U.S. warm weather cossets millions of Canadians each winter. The U.S. presence pervades every aspect of Canadian life because we welcome it, we benefit from it, and we want it to continue. Canadians can justly take pride in their distinctiveness, but there is no other country with which we are as closely aligned in our core values: respect for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

Comment: First of all, to suggest that American core values are based upon the "respect for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law", is laughable if it wasn't so scary. Are these writers so hopelessly niave that they've already forgotten about Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay or extraordinary rendition? Or perhaps they are pushing an agenda in order to frighten readers into blind submission and acceptance of their master's plans for a New World Order?

[...] The point comes home quickly if we devote just a few minutes to thinking about the next possible terrorist outrage. As the 9/11 commission in the United States has pointed out, it is not a question of whether, but when. It could be a dirty bomb in a sports stadium. It could be a truck bomb destroying the CN Tower in Toronto. Or it could be ricin in the water supplying Los Angeles. Wherever the terrorists strike next in North America, our vulnerability will be made clear within minutes. The border will close. This time, it may not be reopened as quickly as it was after 9/11. The next outrage will bring fear and determination to new levels. And the first instinct will be to circle the wagons.

Such scenarios tend to be dismissed by many Canadians as scare tactics. That too is a mistake. We must coolly assess the risks as well as the benefits of our unchangeable geographic proximity. The choice is as stark as it is clear. When the wagons circle, do Canadians want to be on the outside looking in or the other way around? To ask the question is to answer it. The implications for our economic security will far exceed those for the U.S.

Comment: Here our intrepid columnists use the age old tactic of manipulate, dismiss and divert. First they use the well worn scare tactic of a threat of the next terrorist attack, giving a distinctly Canadian example, then ridicule those who would call such manipulations for what are, as scare tactics, then divert attention away from their manipulation with the specious logic of an all or nothing scenario, where somehow Canada would be worse off being "on the outside", if such an event were to transpire.

The first task that faces us is to restore the belief in American hearts and minds that Canada is a reliable partner. That is how most Canadians want to be seen, and it is how most Americans used to feel. Drift and neglect in our relationship have diminished the trust and confidence we used to take for granted on both sides of the border. The government's decision to opt out of missile defence has not helped. We know that the U.S. remains ready to work with us. The President has made that clear. We should respond quickly and forcefully and undo the damage of the past decade of wilful neglect.

We must restore trust by addressing our common security needs and by strengthening our common North American security perimeter, as the tri-national task force co-chaired by former deputy prime minister John Manley recommended last week. Within that perimeter, people should be able to move freely, but on both sides of the 49th parallel there is work to be done, and it is best done jointly and co-operatively rather than singly and at possible cross purposes. A long history of working together, from NORAD and NATO to the Smart Border accord, has created a strong foundation, but far more needs to be done to confront the growing obstacles we now face, some of our own making, and some the result of a changing strategic context. The February budget made a start at modernizing and revitalizing the Canadian Forces, but to regain our ability to participate fully in the defence and security of Canada and North America, much more is required. [...]

George W. Bush is not the issue. Canadians need to get on with life and recognize the absolute necessity, in our own self-interest, of building a modern security relationship and of securing access to the market that drives our prosperity. To do otherwise is foolish and reckless.

Comment: George W. Bush is precisely the issue. This megalomaniac, twice-unelected psychopathic leader of the not-so-free world is hell bent on ushering in World War III. And if these so-called columnists would have their way, they would see Canadian sovereignty flushed down the toilet of human history as their beloved country joined ranks with the Hitler of our time.

Over the past three years, there has been a vibrant debate in Canada on the details of what we need to do. There is no shortage of good ideas, but adopting a bold, realistic and holistic approach to relations with our giant neighbour to the south requires a government prepared to exercise leadership. Nor can the agenda be adopted piecemeal. Thanks to the role of special interests in Washington, nothing will be accomplished by attempting incremental bites. The U.S. political system has never worked that way, and never will.
Mr. Bush's invitation to Paul Martin and Mexican President Vicente Fox to meet with him to discuss the future of North America provides a golden opportunity to make clear that Canada wants to work with the United States to build a zone of mutual confidence and a community of law. We must articulate and pursue our broad political goals. We call on our political leaders to commit Canada to a course that will secure our future. If they allow the relationship to continue to drift, Canadians could judge them harshly. History certainly will.

Comment: Indeed, history will judge Canadians harshly should they allow their "democratically elected" government continue it's increasingly cozy relationship with the beast and his empire.

Allan Gotlieb was Canada's ambassador to the U.S. from 1981 to 1988; Wendy Dobson is a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management; and Michael Hart is the Simon Reisman chair in trade policy at Carleton University.

Comment: Despite the dire warnings and subtle manipulations of the writer's above, a recent poll finds that ordinary Canadians want nothing to do with closer integration with the United States, and were overwhelmingly supportive of the government's recent decision to opt out of the proposed ballistic missile defense shield.

Pulp Fiction Propaganda

Outside of the recent coronation of Pope "Joey Ratz", the Catholic Church was also in the headlines recently with it's public denunciations of the Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown.

While I didn't actually read this novel, I did get to listen to an abridged version on an audio CD while driving to the coast last summer. While an entertaining listen, I have to agree with the Holy Roman Cardinals on this one, the da Vinci Code is rife with inaccuracies. It's unexpected mass popularity, for such an poorly written novel, seems strange, almost as if it's been hyped and promoted "by design" in order to send out a certain "meme" or message that the PTB want the general populace to hear.

They seem to be deliberately promoting the idea that Jesus was married, had children, and that his descendants are the original San Graal or Holy Grail. And even though there may be some truth to this, Dan Brown's novel, at best is a light escape into the world of pulp fiction fantasy, and at worst is diversionary propaganda overly promoted by the controllers away from the real story of the Holy Grail.

Because there are serious researchers out there who are uncovering some very interesting connections between da Vinci's esoteric artwork, The alchemist Fulcanelli, the Holy Grail, and the controllers who have been rulling our planet for thousands of years.

The truth of our reality is far stranger than any pulp fiction propaganda.

Relic

Smoking is Good for You

There is hardly any area of our western society more fraught with lies and disinformation than that of the issue of tobacco smoking. It seems the anti-smoking zealots are out in full force these days, emboldened by governement propaganda, to make sure none of us who actually enjoy the occasional cigarette are even allowed to partake in our own homes. Such is the Owellian state of the world when the Powers that Be can intrude on personal lifestyle choices, and be backed by the easily suggestible popular majority.

There is a side of the anti-smoking debate that rarely, if ever gets mentioned in the mainstream press; that there is quite a bit of factual scientific data which suggests that smoking tobacco can be beneficial to your health. I know it may sound crazy and unbelievable to many who have been conditioned for years by the rabid anti-smoking campaign waged by our "elected" representatives, but what if it's true?.

What if most of the lung cancer, heart disease, and other serious ailments routinely blamed on the demon leaf, were actually caused by a sedentary lifestyle, a fast food diet rich in trans-fats, and environmental pollution and toxins spewed forth by administration-friendly corporate behemoths? What if there was some specific benefit to smoking that the government doesn't want you to know about, much less partake in? Benefits like increased blood flow to the brain, resulting in increased attention span and ability to concentrate, improved memory function and reasoning capabilities? Why in the world would our government not want us to be able to think well, to remain mentally sluggish, apathetic and asleep.

It seems there is much more than meets the eye behind the global push to ban smoking. A sinister agenda whose interests are served when bright capable individuals, manipulated by manufactured fear of smoking tobacco, choose to give up the very thing that might help them SEE behind the lies of their benevolent leaders, to a world very different than what is commonly accepted.

Sitting on the porch, enjoying a good smoke...

Relic

Mossad Killed Hariri

UPDATE:
As an addendum to my earlier post on another blog entitled Fingerprints of Mossad, comes another fine article from the Signs of the Times website by Joe Quinn, which does a good job encapsulating how the Mossad assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri is a virtual carbon copy of an earlier killing in Beirut of then PLO Chief Ali Hassan Salameh in 1979. I am reprinting only the first part of the article here as an excerpt, so that informed readers can see how the Israeli secret service operates according to their motto "by way of deception, thou shalt do war".

(On an aside note, I encourage readers who have read the novel the Da Vinci Code by Dan brown, to take a look at the article; The True Identity of Fulcanelli and The Da Vinci Code by Laura Knight Jadczyk, which is now linked on the Propaganda Alert sidebar under new links).

Relic



Mossad Murders Former Lebanese PM in Carbon Copy of 1979 Assassination

Joe Quinn

We can only conclude that there must be some kind of agreement between world nations that, even when it is patantly obvious, one nation will never expose the activities of anothers' intelligence agency. What other reason can there be for the fact that Iran and Syria were the only two countries to even hint at Israel as being behind the murder of Rafik Hariri on Valentine's day 2005?

Indeed, one of the strongest indications of an Israeli involvement in the murder of Hariri is the fact that not ONE mainstream news source is even mentioning the possibility of Israeli involvement, when it is painfully clear that Israel has the most to gain from his death. But then again, we have become accustomed to the severe lack of intestinal fortitude or any real journalistic integrity on the part of the mainstream media. And also to the fact that much of the Western press is dominated by Israeli sympathisers and/or "Zionists".

To his credit, French President Chirac, perhaps going as far as protocol permitted, held off from immediately implicating any particular group in the murder of his close friend and called for "an immediate international investigation to uncover the real culprits". Coming as it did at the same time as the US government's attempts to force the blame on Syria, Chirac's comment perhaps provides the strongest evidence that Syria was NOT involved. Of course, we don't need the subtle innuendo of any government leader to realise that, while Syria may have stood to gain from the untimely demise of Hariri, it had much more to loose.

This fact however did not stop so-called "journalists" in the mainstream media from sounding off in all directions. An example of the faulty logic used by such pundits is provided by analyst Jean-Pierre Perrin writing in the French daily "Liberation" the day after the assassination of Hariri. Perrin claimed that Chirac's call for an international enquiry to identify the killers was "a way of casting doubt over any Lebanese-Syrian enquiry" and showed Paris also suspects Damascus. Yet surely if Chirac really suspected Syria, he would have said nothing and allowed Syria's accusers to prevail, or added his own voice to the chorus already calling for Syrian "blood". Yet we see that he did exactly the opposite and in doing so made clear his opinion that Syria was NOT to blame.

Most readers will be aware that, over the past few years, the US and Israel have been making loud and repeated claims that Syria is "funding Palestinian and Iraqi terrorism". There have also been growing signs that, if the US and Israel can fabricate enough "evidence", Syria may well be the next stop in the "war on terror". It is also public knowledge that Hariri had resigned as Prime Minister last year over Syrian meddling in Lebanese government affairs and was in favor of a withdrawal of the 14,000 Syrian troops from Lebanon (although he had never openly criticised the Syrian government.) Given these facts, is it really reasonable to believe that Syria would publically assassinate Hariri and, in the process, provide the US and Israel with much needed justification to continue their imperial rampage through the Middle East?

While Hariri might have been quietly pressuring Syria for the ultimate removal of it's troops, he was also well aware of the reason for those troops - to dissuade Israel from staging another invasion of Lebanese territory. Having manipulated Lebanese and world opinion into believing that Syria killed Hariri and with the withdrawal of Syrian troops already under way, Lebanon and its people will once more be exposed to the predations of the butcher Sharon.

From the moment of its creation by Western diplomats in the aftermath of WW I, the potential for religious and ethnic conflict was seemingly built into the very fabric of Lebanese society. Under the gerrymandered borders drawn up by the League of Nations in 1920, extremist Maronite Christians made up 54% of the population with Arabs comprising the remainder, giving the Maronites a controlling stake in the newly formed Lebanese government. Within 40 years however, Arabs had outnumbered Christians and hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees had been forced out of Palestine into Lebanon after the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and the 1967 Israeli-Arab war. In an attempt to maintain control the Lebanese 'Phalange' was formed, an extremist political and military force of the Christian Maronites in Lebanon. The Phalangists' unbending right-wing policies, their resistance to the introduction of fully democratic institutions and to the very idea of Arab nationalism made them natural allies of Israel.

Almost inevitably, civil war between the Arab Lebanese and the Phalangists finally broke out in 1975, with more than a little help from Israel. In 1982, under the pretext of curbing attacks on Israeli troops by the Palestinian PLO in Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin ordered the Israeli army to invade. In a weeklong orgy of bloodletting, then Defence Minister and current Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon ordered his troops to encircle the Lebanese refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila giving the Maronite Phalangists free reign to murder at will. Figures vary, but somewhere between 1,700 and 3,000 Palestinians, most of them innocent civlians, were mercilessly butchered in response to the murder of Israeli-backed Christian Lebanese President-elect Bashir Gemayel.

When a horrified world demanded an explanation of Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, who himself had committed indiscriminate terror in his youth, he said without a word of regret: "Goyim kill Goyim and they blame the Jew."

Despite Israel's denials of responsibility, New York Times correspondent Thomas L. Friedman declared without qualification: "The Israelis knew just what they were doing when they let the Phalangists into those camps."

Sharon and seven other Israeli officials, including Begin, were found guilty the next year by an Israeli commission of "indirect responsibility" for the massacres. Sharon was also found to have "personal responsibility," and he was ordered to resign or be removed as defense minister. Sharon resigned, protesting his innocence, but he was allowed to stay in the cabinet as a minister without portfolio.

The union of the Christian Lebanese and the Israelis has indeed been a long and sordid one and it should come as no surprise that current Lebanese Christian politicians have been quick to join the US and Israel in immediately asserting that Syria was to blame for the murder of Hariri.

By all accounts, Hariri was one of the few "men of peace" left in the Middle East. In his two terms as Lebanese PM since 1990, he had brought Lebanon out of the carnage wrought by 15 years of civil war and set it well on the way to reclaiming its status as the "Paris of the Middle East." Hariri willingly expended his personal fortune on Lebanon's recovery pouring millions into the reconstruction of Beirut. Viewed as a leading Arab-world reformer, he was also credited with restoring Lebanon's reputation abroad as a liberal, open Middle Eastern country. He paid for the 1989 Christian-Muslim peace conference in Taif, Saudi Arabia, which laid the foundation for the ceasefire that came a year later. During his tenure as Prime Minister, Harari also made it his goal to ensure that the religious divisions (Christian and Islamic) were kept out of politics.

When you think of Israel, what are the first thoughts that come to mind? Belagured? Threatened? Only democracy in the Middle East? A vanguard for Western Democracy in its battle to stem the tide of rampant Arab terrorism? Rightful homeland of all "Jews"? If these thoughts come to mind when you think of the state of Israel, then the IDF and/or the Mossad have an opening you might be interested in. My point is that Israel, in its current incarnation as an illegal and ultimately untenable statelet, far from seeking the eradication of "terrorism", finds itself in the paradoxical postion of NEEDING a permanent threat to its existence in order for it to continue to exist and expand its borders into Arab lands.

Which is where the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad comes in.

Mossad's motto is "by way of deception thou shalt wage war" and all of the evidence points to their taking their motto absolutely literally. Over the years, Mossad has worked tirelessly to further the 'interests' of Israel and has made extensive use of False Flag operations to create the appearance that Israel is surrounded by terrorist regimes. From the demonisation of Saddam leading up to the first Gulf War, to the 9/11 attacks, nothing, it seems, is a bridge too far for the world's most ruthless and bloodthirsty intelligence agency. [...]